If a Student Government (SG) debate occurs at an unknown time, does it serve students?
Like the proverbial falling tree in the forest, an event can have little impact if no one knows about it.
SG brought its elections online in keeping with its stated mission this year to increase accessibility to students, then failed to plan in advance to notify students of the debates—arguably the best medium to inform students about the presidential and vice-presidential candidates.
In the March 2 SG meeting, the debate time was set for the following day at noon, only to be rescheduled later that night for 1 p.m. March 5 in the Comet Café.
SG needed to prompt the dialog for setting-up the debate, though another organization hosted it.
This blatant lack of planning in raising awareness is no anomaly. Even SG’s current new town hall project this term was not immune.
The purpose is to have students from their particular school ask questions and listen to top-level administration from the school respond, but student turnout was abysmal.
A slew of town halls swept the first week of March: the School of Natural Sciences & Mathematics; Economics, Political & Policy Sciences (EPPS); and Behavioral & Brain Sciences (BBS).
The town halls were not even mentioned at the SG meeting in late February. An e-mail went out to EPPS students almost two hours prior to the event on Wednesday. Marketing materials, a thick stack of color-printed flyers, wallowed unposted. Flyers for BBS were not posted until two days before the event.
Students should have adequate notice of events that use their student fee money to operate.
The least SG can do for their town halls and debate is get the word out with the same vigor the senators pursue re-election.



4 comments